Health & behaviour: Breast Cancer and Jewish Bras

Breast Cancer and Jewish Bras

By Dr. Wu Tao-Wei






The women of the West have been in the grip of the Jewish fashion industry for many, many, many centuries. After all, clothes are one of the Seven Essentials of Life. After air, water, and food, we all need clothes more than anything else to protect us from the natural environment and for our personal modesty.

So, of course, where there is a need, there are crafty merchants always ready to fill that need. And when there is big money to be made by sewing on an extra ribbon or some lace and calling it "the latest fashion" that every girl must wear, then the stage is set for profiteering on a huge scale. And clothes become not only a necessity but they become an extravagance. And anything that is an extravagance is also expensive. And what produces expense and profits, also produces Jews in the garment business.

Clothes are a necessary part of surviving in most of the world. The Eskimos certainly need them while the natives of Africa can do without. But for those of us who wear clothes, the clothes, themselves, become a part of our environment. And like everything else in the environment, the clothes we wear have an effect upon our health.

For example, there is one element of a woman's wardrobe that causes breast cancer (and possibly lung cancer as well) but which is touted as a totally necessary fashion accessory. And that fashion accessory is the brassier. This may seem funny to men, but to women, breast cancer is no laughing matter. Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women and the second-most common cause of death (lung cancer is first). One in eleven American women will get breast cancer in her lifetime. And since breast cancer kills so many women, they are, quite understandably in terror of this disease. After all, it strikes at both their health and at their sexuality all at once. So, terrified are they of breast cancer that some women have the idiot Western physicians surgically remove both of their breasts AS A PREVENTIVE MEASURE just to make sure that they never catch it! Physicians such as these should never be consulted if you have a headache.

If you peruse the daily newspapers in any American city, you will see that the largest ads which often take up entire pages, are for women's underwear. Ask yourself why, if underwear are supposed to not be seen, are they so prominently displayed? The answer is, of course, that these lacy undergarments make huge profits. A bit of lace and elastic totaling fifty cents in raw materials and sewn together by sweat shops in Asia for a total cost of one dollar, are sold through the very expensive newspapers ads for twenty-five or fifty dollars each. Multiply this times how many bras each woman owns, times all the women in America , and you have a multi-billion dollar industry based solely upon tieing up the breasts of women.

A woman's breast is a complex organ. But it is based upon the simplicity of Mother Nature so it is not so complex that a little bit of thinking cannot fathom its functions. This system of glands, muscles and fatty tissues has a drainage system that is affected by the pull of gravity as well as by the natural sucking pressures of little babies' sweet little lips. This drainage system of lymphatic and mammary glands is like any other drainage system. When it gets plugged up or constricted, it doesn't work.


However, Western medical and scientific thinking is twisted by the Jewish justification for profiteering. Since it is a Jewish Talmudic Law that "any non-Jew who keeps a Jew from making money must be killed", then it is understandable as to why something as simple as breast cancer is never cured but is only treated. After all, to a Jew, by their own admission, their profits are more important than other peoples' lives.

Scientific studies which show that moderate but regular physical activity can reduce a woman's risk of developing pre-menopausal breast cancer by as much as 60 percent, don't seem to register on the Western scientific brain. Other studies that show that women who breast-feed their babies reduce significantly their chances of getting breast and ovarian cancers, also do not light up the Western physicians' mental faculties. But they do have a few neural signatures with studies that show women who eat the most fats, saturated fats and animal protein have a three times greater chance of getting breast cancer than those whose intake of these foods was lowest. Diet, is a profit point for doctors, so for this, they have some opinion. But in regard to bras and cancer, they refrain from thinking. After all, they treat bodies. And clothing is outside of the body, so anything outside of the body is beyond their comprehension.

Naturally, the Western physicians all have myriads of complicated theories as to why breast cancer occurs. After all, if it's complicated, then you need to pay them a lot of money to explain it to you. Simplicity is simply not profitable to them.

But rather than theories, I want to ask you to think about what happens if you wrap a rubber band around your finger and leave it there for a prolonged period of time. The finger turns red, begins to hurt, and if you are crazy enough to leave it there long enough, the finger will die from lack of circulation and turn gangrenous, there-by poisoning your entire body and killing you. So, don't do this at home. Only put a rubber band around your finger under a doctor's supervision. That way, while leaving the rubber band in place, they will be able to cut off your finger as a preventative of blood poisoning! It is the same for the breasts of American women. Only, instead of wrapping rubber bands around their fingers, they are wrapping Jewish fashions around their breasts.

So, perhaps a few more clues might help the Sherlock Holmes in all of us to unravel the mystery. The bra was first marketed in 1912 and 1913. If you inspect the tables for mortality rates for breast cancer, you will find that breast cancer began to increase in the United States in 1914. From that date onward, breast cancer began as a low-incidence disease and started its climb upward to its present-day, first-cause for death in women.


Although the bra was invented by a woman to relieve her own painfully heavy breasts, it was quickly seized upon by the Jewish garment makers as the latest fashion accessory that every woman just HAD to have. After all, they reasoned, if one woman liked it, all women would want to have them. And that is where the money is, in mass production and fashion craze.

But with one in eleven women getting breast cancer, and the doctors and garment makers counting the profits, shouldn't the people, themselves, try to figure out a few things on their own about this? Who else will help us to solve this puzzle? Certainly, they are not willing to.

Well, a couple of people actually did figure out a few things on their own. When Soma Grismaijer got breast cancer, she took off her bra, drank a lot of carrot juice and other natural remedies and the cancer went away. Wondering about this, she and Sydney Ross Singer did some research which they published in a book entitled, "Dressed To Kill: The Link Between Breast Cancer and Bras".

http://www.selfstud ycenter.org/ dressedtokill. htm

They found that "Over-enthusiastic bra wearing, is cutting off lymphatics, which drain all of our body. And the lymphatics of the breast, because the breast is a skin organ, are easily cut off by a slight constriction. If that happens, there's a chronic long term edema building up in the breast....Meanwhile , as the breasts are being constricted, the woman is exposed to toxins as part of everyday life in America . These toxins are delivered to all parts of her body, including the constricted area, by the blood stream. . . Other tissues of the body remove the toxins through normal lymphatic drainage, but the breasts, due to reduced drainage, experience longer-term toxin exposure."

This is pretty good reasoning for people who haven't even considered the effects of bra constriction on the acupuncture meridians!

Combine these findings with the fact that women who breast feed their sweet little babies instead of stuffing rubber nipples full of animal milk or synthetic formula into their mouths, significantly reduce their breast cancer risk, and what do you have? ... Normal, healthy women. A real rarity in the West!

So, Singer and Grismaijer published their book and called a news conference to announce the book and their discoveries. They sent press releases to all of the media outlets including the newspapers and TV. They rented their conference space, prepared their press kits and were all ready for the big day. But no one showed up! Not one news reporter stopped by to get the big story that bras are a major cause of breast cancer! And why? Look in the daily newspaper or in the Sunday section advertising of the big department stores. Bras make money for the garment makers, bras make money for the department store owners, bras make money for the newspapers, bras make money for the mammogram and cancer researchers. Bras are good for business.


So, why would the Media want to announce that bras cause breast cancer? It's bad for business. That's why!





http://www.bamboo- delight.com/ Wu_Files/ Cancer_Bras. txt



____________ ________



Related Articles:

http://libaware. economads. com/brasandbreas tcancer.php

http://www.ps- magazine. com/Well- being_94/ Bras_Still_ Cause_Breast_ Cancer_Are_ Your_Patients_ Dressed_To_ Kill.shtml

http://ezinearticle s.com/?Bras- and-Breast- Cancer--Are- You-Dressed- to-Kill?&id=99756




The opinions expressed herein contain positions and viewpoints that are not necessarily those of the disseminator of the information. These are offered as a means to stimulate dialogue and
discussion.



A Few Highlights of the History of Research

on Bras and Breast Disease


1. In the 1930s a paper was published making a connection between corsets and increased breast cancer rates.

2. 1978 An M.D. in California pubished an article in a medical journal linking bras with elevated breast temperature, and he suggested that this might have a connection with breast cancer. He studied several hundred women in a medical practice and also observed that the heavier the bra material, the hotter the breast, and that bra-free women of all sizes had cooler breasts. (The Lancet, November 4, 1978, P. 1001 Dr. John M. Douglass, Department of Internal Medicine, S. Calif. Permanente Med. Center Los Angeles, California) see also item #8 for more about breast
temperature.

3. 1991 Researchers at Harvard University publish a medical journal article on breast cancer risk. As a side issue of their paper, they mention that the women in their study that did not wear bras had a 60% lower rate of breast cancer than the women who wore bras. (Hsieh, C.C. and D. Trichopoulos, D. Eur. J. Cancer 27:131-5, 1991 "Breast size, handedness and breast cancer risk")

4. 1991 Researchers in Japan pubished a study on bras and sagging, in which they proved that a bra can actually increase breast sagging, rather than the opposite. This effect was most noticeable in larger breasted women. They compared bras to foot binding in their discussion section. ("Breast Form Changes Resulting From A Certain Brassiere" Journal of Hum. Ergol.( Tokyo ) 1990 Jun; 1 (1):53-62. Ashizawa K, Sugane A, Gunji T Institute of Human Living Sciences, Otsuma Women's University, Tokyo , Japan )

5. 1995 Sydney Singer and Soma Grismaijer of the Institute for the Study of Culturogenic Disease published their book, "Dressed to Kill: The Link Between Breast Cancer and Bras," (Avery Press). Their study included almost 4600 women, half of whom had breast cancer and half of whom did not. They found that the more hours per day that a bra is worn, the higher the rate of breast cancer and that women who do not wear bras have a dramatically reduced rate of breast cancer. Singer and Grismaijer have a website at: http://www.selfstud ycenter.org/

6. 1995 through the present. Many women, who had concerns about breast cancer risk and/or breast pain, quit wearing bras and then found that their pain and cysts of fibrocystic breast disease was dramatically decreased or eliminated. Several of these women wrote their own personal case histories, which appear on the web at: http://www.all- natural.com/ fibrocys. html

7. May 1999. A landmark study was published in the prestigious British medical journal, The Lancet. This study showed that pre-menopausal women with fibrocystic breast disease have an almost 6-fold higher risk of future breast cancer. This study firmly refutes the advice of some doctors who have said that fibrocystic carries no increased risk. In all, there are now over 30 published medical and scientific research articles showing a connection between fibrocystic and increased breast cancer risk. (Lancet 1999 May 22;353(9166) :1742-5 "Risk of breast cancer in women with palpable breast cysts: a prospective study." Edinburgh Breast Group. Dixon JM, McDonald C, Elton RA, Miller WR Edinburgh Breast Unit, Western General Hospital , UK .")

8. 2000. Two British breast surgeons conduct clinical trials at two breast clinics in England and Wales . They study 100 women to see if going brafree (a more positive term the physicians used for braless) could lessen breast pain. Their study concluded that the majority of pre-menopausal women found decreased pain during a three-month bra-free study period. The women were instructed to not wear a bra for three months, and instead to wear a loose and non-restricting camisole if they desired an alternative undergarment. For comparison, they then returned to wearing bras for the another three months. For additional study control, another group of women did the reverse and were bra-wearers for three months, then bra-free for three months. A half-hour documentary was filmed in conjunction with the studies and was shown on nationwide television in England in November, 2000 on Channel 4 UK. Several of the women were interviewed and discussed the life-altering improvements in their breast health, such as being able to now pick up their children or hug their spouse without pain. (Simon Cawthorne, M.D. surgeon at Frenchay Hospital, Bristol, England and Prof. Robert Mansel, M.D., Surgery Dept. Head, University of Wales Medical School, Cardiff, Wales.)


Doctors interviewed in the film commented about how breasts in bras are hotter than bra-free breasts and the possible connection of thisbreast heating with breast cancer. Prof. Hugh Simpson discussed his published research, which has previously proven that pre-cancerous and cancerous breasts are both hotter than normal breasts. The documentary included video thermography of women with and without bras, proving that bras cause localized heating of breast tissue.


9. 2000. A group of researchers in Japan published their studies showing that wearing a girdle and bra lowers the levels of the hormone melatonin by 60 percent. (Chronobiol Int 2000 Nov;17(6):783- 93 "The effects of skin pressure by clothing on circadian rhythms of core temperature and salivary melatonin." Lee YA, Hyun KJ, Tokura H, Department of Environmental Health, Nara Women's University, Japan.) Melatonin is intimately involved with sleep cycles and is used to prevent jet-lag. Numerous published studies have suggested that melatonin has anti-cancer activities, that it is an antioxidant and can prevent DNA damage, and that it is intimately involved in the immune system and can bind directly to T helper cells. Researchers in Spain have published an article outlining the possible use of melatonin in breast cancer prevention and treatment (Histol Histopathol 2000 Apr;15(2):637- 47). Recent research (J. Hansen, "Light at Night, Shiftwork, and Breast Cancer Risk" J Natl Cancer Inst 2001; 93: 1513-1515) has shown that nighttime exposure to light is associated with increased rates of breast cancer. This builds upon previous research that showed that light at night suppresses melatonin production.

10. December 2000. A medical doctor published his findings on shoulder pain treatment in women with large breasts. In this five-year study, it was suggested that patients remove the weight from their shoulders for a period of two weeks, either by going braless or by wearing a strapless bra. Only one woman chose a strapless bra and all the others went braless. quoting the article, "Long-term outcome was presence or absence of muscle pain and tenderness. Seventy-nine percent of patients decided to remove breast weight from the shoulder permanently because it rendered them symptom free." (Ryan, EL, Clin J Pain 2000 Dec;16(4):298- 303, "Pectoral girdle myalgia in women: a 5-year study in a clinical setting.")

http://www.susunwee d.com/An_ Article_Bra- disease.htm




Previous Health & Behaviour Articles:

http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/DDN/ links/The_ Muslim_Family_ 001125780118/ Medical_Issue

_001129212681/ Health_and_ Behaviour_ 001169751308/


1. Salt can be hard to shake

2. The Map of the Brain

3. Fast Food - Burgers

4. Fish intake linked to higher IQ in offspring

5. Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention

6. The Importance of Food and Correct Nutritional Habits

7. Stanford Diet Study Tips Scale in Favor of Atkins Plan

8. Smoking - Calculate Your Risk of Lung Cancer

9. Singapore Muslim Girl's Organs Save Four People

10. Breast Cancer - Education Not Medication

11. Diet in Islam

12. The Role of a Muslim Doctor





K a r i m a